Even as I age, I sometimes find I am still scratching around for something to be proud of; something unique about me; something which I have not yet attempted in my dotage. But, amongst the forest of things from which I suppose I could choose, I didn’t consider a component of that metonymous forest, to wit a tree, ranked particularly high. But, I guess amongst other things, that is what Age is known for: cherry-picking unusual and seldom-related things as examples of wisdom: things which are not necessarily important for the crowd that surrounds them.
As an example, the culture and epoch in which I find myself embedded does not regard reading as a particularly specialist endeavour, although one might be tempted to question its variations I suppose: I prefer the feel of reading a hard cover book, although I will admit that it is more of a smellful touchy-feely thing and unguided by any added value. Until fairly recently, I have usually found myself drawn to the older, more recondite literature because I sometimes find it more hardscrabble to understand the meaning of many of today’s popular idioms (hardscrabble not being a member of that crowd).
But still, reading is reading, and despite its more recent camouflage, is still reaping a surprising harvest of different styles: gathering new words for the stew we all end up enjoying, if not entirely understanding. I mean, so what if the local library has been forced to surrender to digital formats and include computers in the stacks. At the very least it attracts those who do not possess smartphones, or find it tiresome to read from them; it also attracts those who do not wish to bring their tablets on a bus because it’s too easy for the stranger in the seat beside them to eavesread them.
But as an elder and still attached to tradition, I think it still behooves me to write a few words to retaliate against page-snobbery and paper hubris. Actually, I suppose one might think I should be the last to attempt to defend digital reading preferences -someone who texts as if I were still using a typewriter with one stiff index finger, and an inability either to accurately target those tiny smartphone keys, or the patience see them with enough clarity that I don’t have to constantly reread the message which the little daemon-of-the-chips has tried to correct before I send it.
Hats off to those who not only can see the little keys, but manage to hit them on the first try with their thumbs. I mean I had always assumed that opposable thumbs were designed for grasping objects or hitchhiking, not casting aside years of evolutionary change from long slender fingers and sometimes, like opossums (or is it ‘opossa’?), ditsy smaller thumbs for climbing things. Come to think of it though, maybe our having longer opposable thumbs are inadvertent exaptations, evolutionary spandrels that somehow anticipated (or is it the other way around?) the little smartphone keys. I mean perhaps it’s like asking how Nature knew to use the jaw bones of our ancient fish ancestors and repurpose them as the incus and malleus ear bones we need for listening to music with our headphones. Nature is very mysterious; of course so is texting and reading on smartphones I guess…
But merely accepting the magic of Nature and how it adapts does little to explain the youthful preference of reading things on a little screen that would be difficult to shave with, let alone practice tooth hygiene at bedtime (the relatively recent ability to reverse the direction of the screen for taking selfies notwithstanding).
But whatever, those of us who need to use the phone’s magnifier to read the ingredients on the side of cereal boxes, or the instructions on our prescription bottles, can thank our kids for showing us how to find the magnifier without our thumbs. Those are probably the same kids who manage to read Dostoevsky’s the Idiot on their screens, while we are still trying to figure out the emojis on ours. And we should not be so quick to criticize the fact that they actually figured out how to read the comic-book format of the novel on their screens; we elders wouldn’t have a clue how to do that or explain the story without a month’s preparation to find a library copy, and then the time to read it.
I suppose it all comes down to substance, eh? Should we be judging the story, the author, the style in which it was written, or the reason why it was written in the first place? Maybe books are a bit like like clothes: you dress in the fashion appropriate for the occasion. In its digital format, and in the aisle of a crowded bus, one can read a precis of what is needed from a story -its message, its style, and its usefulness- without acknowledging the sources. I remember using the Classic Comic Books of my time for the various book-reports I was assigned throughout high school. I mean, is there actually a difference from the use of AI summaries nowadays? Maybe in years hence, they too may seem like the once fashionable bell-bottom pants I once wore…
It’s not so much how you read surely, as what you read; there is as much trash, as much misinformation, and as much addictive stuff in books as online. Nowadays it’s just displayed in a different, quicker format than we older people are used to. I mean hurray for information; we just have to accept that there are different ways of obtaining it.
I’m impressed with the variety of knowledge the youth exhibit these days, and the way they’ve learned to dissect the many sources they encounter. The more varied it is, the broader their knowledge base, and the more choices their cerebral digestive mechanisms have on their plates to work with. Graphic novels, for example, are just one part of the acquisition of knowledge… or so I tell myself, looking back over my multi-flawed youth.
Understanding the world requires that we at least try to read it by one means or another, I think. And anyway at my age, as a fallback, I can always ask one of my kids to explain it to me…
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016